Consulting agreements.
Scope, IP, and no surprises.
Deliverables that aren't defined. IP that stays with the consultant. Liability caps set at one month's fees. Post-engagement restrictions that are overbroad. Kontractually reviews consulting agreements against your playbook before you sign.
No credit card required. First 3 reviews free.
6 provisions to review in every consulting agreement.
Kontractually checks these against your playbook rules before you sign.
Under Australian copyright law, the author of a work owns the copyright - unless there is an agreement transferring it. For employees, copyright generally vests in the employer. For consultants (independent contractors), the consultant retains copyright unless the agreement explicitly assigns it to the client. A consulting agreement that is silent on IP means the consultant may own the deliverables they created, even if you paid for them. Kontractually flags consulting agreements that lack explicit IP assignment language.
Common market positions vary by engagement type. For professional services consulting, 12 months of fees is typical for a standard engagement. For high-risk advisory work (financial, strategic), caps may be higher or tied to professional indemnity insurance. Some caps are set at total fees paid under the agreement - which for short engagements may be very low. Kontractually flags caps below your defined threshold.
Scope should define: specific deliverables (not just 'consulting services'), acceptance criteria for deliverables (what does 'completed' look like?), exclusions from scope (what is explicitly out), the change order process (how is additional scope authorised and priced), and who has authority to instruct the consultant. Vague scope is the starting point for most consulting disputes.
Yes. Many consulting engagements use a framework agreement (the consulting agreement) and individual statements of work that define specific deliverables and fees. Upload both documents and review each against your playbook - the framework for liability, IP, and confidentiality; the SOW for scope, deliverables, and payment.
For consulting agreements, courts apply the same reasonableness test as for employment restraints. Duration beyond 6-12 months is increasingly difficult to justify for most consulting roles. Geographic scope must match the actual footprint of the engagement. Restrictions on working with competitors generally require a legitimate business interest to protect. Kontractually flags restraints that exceed standard market benchmarks.
Also useful
Review every consulting agreement before you sign.
Set up your consulting agreement playbook in 10 minutes. First 3 reviews free.
Start free trial